Drawing for UPPLE

USPTO serial 79281077

UPPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with UPPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Groos

Richard J. Groos King & Spalding LLP500 West 2nd Street, 1800Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032non-alcoholic fruit-based drinks being ades; alcohol-free beers; alcohol-free cider; beverages consisting of a blend of fruit and vegetable juices; beverages made from fruit concentrates; bottled fruit drinks; bottled fruit juices; bottled water; carbonated non-alcoholic drinks; non-alcoholic sweetened drinks of diluted fruit juices, namely, ades; carbonated water; cider, non-alcoholic; cocktails, non-alcoholic; concentrates for use in the preparation of fruit juice drinks; concentrates for use in the preparation of soft drinks; non-alcoholic cordials; non-alcoholic edible essences for making non-alcoholic beverages, not in the nature of essential oils; flavoured water beverages; fresh fruit juices; frozen concentrated fruit drinks; frozen concentrated fruit juices; frozen fruit juices; fruit based drinks; fruit beers; fruit beverages; fruit concentrates for making beverages; fruit drinks; fruit flavoured non-alcoholic drinks; fruit flavoured squashes; aerated drinks (non-alcoholic); fruit juice beverages; fruit juice beverages that contain multi vitamins; fruit juice concentrates; fruit juice extracts, namely, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; fruit juice extracts for use as a beverage; fruit juices; fruit squashes; fruit syrups for making beverages; lemonades containing fruit extracts; low calorie fruit juices; non-alcoholic carbonated drinks; non-alcoholic cocktail bases; non-alcoholic cocktails; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; non-fermented fruit juices; smoothies; spring water, other than for medical purposes; squashes, namely, lemon squash; still water; aerated mineral waters; drinking water other than for medical use; aerated fruit juices; aerated spring waters; aerated water; alcohol free spiritsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 22, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 10, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 7, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 6, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 20, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance