USPTO serial 79281263
CLOUDSAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOUDSAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOUIS K EBLING
LOUIS K EBLING THOMPSON HINE LLP312 WALNUT STREETSUITE 1400CINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; bean bag chairs and pillows, cushions | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services and online retail store services featuring apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes, furniture, mirrors, picture frames, bean bags, cushions, bedding, household or kitchen utensils and containers, combs and sponges, brushes except paint brushes, brush-making materials, articles for cleaning purposes, steelwool, unworked or semi-worked glass except glass used in building, glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes, ornaments made of ceramics, china, crystal, earthenware, glass or porcelain, mugs and cups, ropes, string, nets, tents, awnings, tarpaulins, sails, sacks and bags, padding and stuffing materials except of rubber or plastics, raw fibrous textile materials, textiles and textile goods, bed covers, table covers, clothing, footwear, headgear, carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum and other materials for covering existing floors wall hangings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |