USPTO serial 79281288
LEOPARD CUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEOPARD CUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Thomas
John H. Thomas John H. Thomas, P.C.536 Granite AvenueRichmond, VA 23226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded media containing computer software for the measurement of dimensions, volume and weight of goods and products or for capturing the volumetric data of goods and products, or in relation to products used in transport, distribution and logistics; mobile communication terminals, namely, mobile computers for the measurement of dimensions, volume and weight of goods and products or for capturing the volumetric data of goods and products, or in relation to products used in transport, distribution and logistics; mobile data communications apparatus, namely, mobile data receivers for the measurement of dimensions, volume and weight of goods and products or for capturing the volumetric data of goods and products, or in relation to products used in transport, distribution and logistics; mobile telecommunications apparatus, namely, mobile transceivers for the measurement of dimensions, volume and weight of goods and products or for capturing the volumetric data of goods and products, or in relation to products used in transport, distribution and logistics; scanners being data processing equipment for the measurement of dimensions, volume and weight of goods and products or for capturing the volumetric data of goods and products, or in relation to products used in transport, distribution and logistics; barcode scanners, hand scanners, optical scanners, image scanners and scanners for industrial inspection; personal digital assistants (pdas); electronic devices and structural parts thereof for the measurement of dimensions, volume and weight of goods and products; systems composed of electronic devices and structural parts thereof for the measurement of dimensions, volume and weight of goods and products; electronic devices and structural parts thereof for capturing the volumetric data of goods and products; systems composed of electronic devices and structural parts thereof for capturing the volumetric data of goods and products | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Distribution of goods, namely, transportation of goods ; parcel distribution, namely, parcel delivery ; warehousing of goods ; advisory services relating to the packing, cargo handling, storage, distribution being transportation, and transport of goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 23, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 2, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |