USPTO serial 79281511
YOUTH A STATE OF MIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUTCHISON, DAVID A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOUTH A STATE OF MIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC901 New York Avenue, N.W.Suite 900 EastWashington, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated cosmetics; non-medicated soaps; soaps for cosmetic use; non-medicated body soaps; cosmetic preparations for baths; hair shampoos; non-medicated shampoos; perfumery preparations; perfumes; scented waters for cosmetic personal use; deodorants for cosmetic personal use; cosmetic skin care preparations; lotions for cosmetic use; beauty masks; skin whitening creams; cosmetic preparations for cleansing and removing make-up from the skin; oils for cosmetic use; cosmetic preparations for slimming; cosmetic skin-tanning preparations; make-up; lipsticks; lip glosses; pencils for cosmetic use; make-up; mascara for eyelashes; nail polish; make-up powders; facial foundation; non-medicated hair lotions; hair sprays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 5, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |