Drawing for K-BOX

USPTO serial 79281570

K-BOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with K-BOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Services for providing food and drink; services for the preparation of food and drink; restaurant services for the provision of fast food; fast food restaurants; fast-food restaurant services; food and drink preparation services; food preparation; food preparation servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 16, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 13, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 16, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 15, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 30, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance