USPTO serial 79281956
SKIPLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRIZANT, JAMES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKIPLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking (supervision), emergency (life-saving) and teaching apparatus and instruments; data processing equipment, computers; game software; software (recorded programs); computer peripheral devices; integrated circuit cards [smart cards] | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; information on telecommunications; communications by computer terminals or by fiber-optic networks; communications by radio or telephone; mobile radio telephony services; provision of user access to global computer networks; provision of on-line forums; provision of access to databases; electronic bulletin board services (telecommunication services); connection by telecommunications to a global computer network; news or information agencies; rental of telecommunication apparatus; transmission (or broadcasting) of radio or television programs; teleconferencing or videoconferencing services; electronic messaging services; rental of access time to global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Evaluations and assessments in the fields of science and technology provided by engineers; scientific and technical research; design and development of computers and software; research and development of new products for third parties; technical project studies; architecture; design of interior decor; development (design), installation, maintenance, updating or rental of software; computer programming; computer system analysis; computer system design; consultancy in the design and development of computers; digitization of documents; software as a service (SaaS); cloud computing; information technology (IT) consultancy; hosting of servers; vehicle roadworthiness testing; graphic arts design services; styling (industrial design); authentication of works of art; energy auditing; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |