Drawing for WEBER WEPACK

USPTO serial 79281976

WEBER WEPACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBER WEPACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH T. NABOR

Joseph T. Nabor Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP120 South LaSalle StreetSuite 2100Chicago, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Packaging machines for foodstuffs; robots for food packaging; conveyors for packaging food portions and food products; conveyor belts for food packaging machines; machines for separating and isolating packaged foodstuffs; machines for labeling and lettering food packaging; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 28, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 16, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 17, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 29, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 29, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 29, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 2022EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 6, 2022GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2022GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2022CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 19, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 18, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 18, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 18, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 18, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 4, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 1, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 31, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance