USPTO serial 79281977
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea S. Fuelleman
Andrea S. Fuelleman Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLPTwo North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700Chicago, IL 60602UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Pumps for machines; pumps as parts of machines, engine and motor; land vehicle water pumps; machine parts, namely, valves being parts of machines; regulating valves; regulating valves being parts of machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Data processing devices, namely data processing equipment; downloadable mobile phone application software for controlling water pumps; water pressure measuring apparatus; electric connectors; electric industrial remote control for water pumps; signal transmitters, namely transmitters of electronic signals | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Cooling apparatus and devices; water heaters; water supply devices; water distributions installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cooling apparatus and devices, namely cooling installations for water; water heaters; water supply devices, namely regulating accessories for water supply in the nature of metered valves; water distributions apparatuses, namely heat pumps, solar heating appliances and solar installations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 4, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |