USPTO serial 79282023
SMART SETUP STATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART SETUP STATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aichi 472-8686, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC4000 LEGATO ROAD SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic computers including central processing units, electronic circuits and magnetic discs recorded with computer programs, other computer peripherals; recording media in the nature of CDs, DVD-ROMs and USB drives featuring recorded computer operating programs for use in support of loading electronic component feeding apparatus on automatic electronic parts mounting machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 26, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |