USPTO serial 79282171
GORILLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GORILLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE P. CIOTOLA
MICHELLE P. CIOTOLA CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREET22ND FLOORHARTFORD, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Braids; silicone braids; reinforcing elastic bands for clothing namely expanding bands for holding sleeves, trimmings for clothing; elastic ribbons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 1, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |