USPTO serial 79282388
SMART SAFE SCHOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART SAFE SCHOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GPS, lora, wi-fi, bluetooth tracking devices, namely, vehicle trackers, personal trackers, child trackers, indoor and outdoor positioning trackers, vehicle trackers, cargo trackers, lora, wi-fi, GPS, bluetooth trackers; computer hardware and software for monitoring and control of people and assets safety and security, and monitoring and control of environmental parameters; electronic equipment for automatic monitoring and control of air quality, temperature, and illumination through electronic sensors and motorized actuators; school automation system comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices to operate lighting, temperature, and air condition parameters, all for use in connection with thermostats, security sensors, light bulbs, light switches, electrical outlets, cameras, and smart electric panels and wireless control hubs, air purifiers, humidifiers, dehumidifiers, air conditioners, fans, heaters and vacuums that can be monitored and controlled (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); safety system for natural and man-made disaster monitoring and early warning, which includes electronic sensors, wireless and wired controllers, and wireless control hubs which can optionally be connected to motorized actuators and surveillance cameras with ability to transmit video via the internet, local area networks, cellular networks, satellite and other means as well as save video into internal or cloud storage; safety system for vehicles comprising SOS buttons, vehicle diagnostic modules, wireless and wired electronic sensors, namely, seat belt sensors, seat belt locks, sensors for seat belt, sensors for passenger presence detection, tire pressure sensors, air quality sensors, temperature sensors, humidity sensors; equipment for driving alerts, speeding alerts, harsh turning, braking and acceleration, and seat belt use indicators (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations); safety system for a school bus which can optionally be connected to motorized actuators and surveillance cameras with ability to transmit video via the internet, local area networks, cellular networks, satellite and other means as well as save video into internal or cloud storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |