USPTO serial 79282800
LA GRANGETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA GRANGETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW W CHU
ANDREW W CHU CRAFT CHU PLLC1204 HEIGHTS BOULEVARDHOUSTON, TX 77008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software, namely, downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for use in hydroponic plant growing that controls water application, temperature, and light; Downloadable connected and autonomous cultivation control software for use in hydroponic plant growing that controls water application, temperature, and light | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | Aeroponic and hydroponic grow cabinet for connected and autonomous cultivation in the nature of a closed environment with lights, exhaust system, aeroponic misting chamber, and automated control system for lighting, heating, steam generation, refrigeration, drying, ventilating and water distributions | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Development, design, installation, maintenance, updating and rental of software; creation, hosting, and setting up of Internet sites containing online stores; all of the aforementioned services related to hydroponic plant growing or connected and autonomous cultivation materials and processes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRADIER GROUPE
- Other trademarks owned by Monsieur Thibaut PRADIER
- Other trademarks owned by Monsieur Thibaut PRADIER
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LA GRANGETTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |