USPTO serial 79282859
ASCEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASCEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Central processing units [processors]; computer central processing units; raster image processors; digital signal processors; digital voice signal processors; central processing units for processing information, data, sound or images; graphics processor units (GPU); graphics accelerators; electronic cards for processing images; chip cards; chip card readers; memory boards; memory expansion modules; computer motherboards; cards with integrated circuits; microchip cards; microcomputers; electronic circuit cards; semi-conductor memory units; semi-conductor memories; interface cards for data processing equipment in the form of printed circuits; computer daughterboards; Local Area Network Server; network servers; Internet servers; computer network servers; computer servers; network hosting servers; data processing apparatus; computer memory devices; computers; computer programs, recorded; computer operating programs, recorded; computer software, recorded; smart cards [integrated circuit cards]; integrated circuit cards [smart cards]; computer programs, downloadable; computer software applications, downloadable; security tokens [encryption devices]; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; chips [integrated circuits]; electronic chips; microchips; computer chips; microchips [computer hardware]; multiprocessor chips; high definition integrated graphic chips; biochip sensors; electronic chips for the manufacture of integrated circuits; printed circuits; integrated circuits; printed circuit boards; electronic integrated circuits; integrated circuit modules; decision circuits; flexible circuit boards; interface circuits for video cameras; circuit boards provided with integrated circuits; large scale integrated circuits; circuit boards; electronic circuits; electronic circuit board; logic circuits; microcontrollers; computer circuit boards; programmable logic controllers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |