Drawing for SEALAB

USPTO serial 79282888

SEALAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6187404Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 3, 2020
Examiner
LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SEALAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $325

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Trevor A. Caudle, Esq.

Trevor A. Caudle, Esq. Trevor Caudle Law Practice, PC350 Bay Street, #100-363San Francisco, CA 94133United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Wristwatches; chronographs being watches; mechanical watches; clocks and watchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 13, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2022WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2022WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 18, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2021FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 3, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 18, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 17, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 17, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 16, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance