Drawing for HEINTZMANN TRAFFIC SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 79282945

HEINTZMANN TRAFFIC SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERLIN, JUSTIN E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HEINTZMANN TRAFFIC SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ursula B. Day

Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day35 West 35th StreetSuite 900New York, NY 10001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Preassembled building parts, shaped parts, profile parts of metal, and sheets and plates of metal in the form of crash barriers, crash walls, skid barriers, guard walls, noise protection embankments and sight-screen walls for roads; building parts, shaped parts and profile parts of metal for crash barriers, crash walls and skid barriers, guard walls, noise protection embankments and sight-screen walls for roads; road signs and panels, non-luminous and non-mechanical, of metal, for roads; metal bollards; non-electronic road blocks and traffic barriers, pivotable horizontally or vertically, of metal; marker road studs and marker knobs of steel for marking carriagewaysACTIVE—
019Preassembled building parts, shaped parts, profile parts, not of metal, in the form of crash barriers, crash walls, skid barriers, guard walls, noise protection embankments and sight-screen walls for roads; building parts, shaped parts and profile parts, not of metal, for crash barriers, crash walls, skid barriers, guard walls, noise protection embankments and sight-screen walls for roads; road signs and panels, non-luminous and non-mechanical, not of metal; bollards, not of metal; non-electronic road barricades and traffic barriers, being horizontally or vertically pivotable, not of metal; glass granules for road marking; road marking sheets and strips of synthetic material; marker road studs and marker knobs of plastic for marking carriagewaysACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance, repair and/or servicing of crash barriers, lane separators, traffic barriers, guide barriers, sliding barriers, protective barriers, sound barriers and privacy walls for roads, road signs and boards, bollards and road barricades; road marking servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 29, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Sep 29, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 29, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 28, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 27, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 13, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance