USPTO serial 79283060
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LONDON EC3M 6B, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelley S. Gordon
Kelley S. Gordon Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 South Wacker Drive6300 Willis TowerChicago, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and marketing services; marketing consultation services; business consulting services in the field of creation, delivery and measurement of effectiveness of digital advertising and marketing; business consultancy services, namely, online media monitoring services, using computer software to automatically monitor internet websites and online publications for customer-specific topics and to capture relevant content on those topics, and providing documentation and analysis of that online content to others for business purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software that provides analysis of contents of websites and online publications to determine the relevance of the website for customer's marketing purposes; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for automated media monitoring in the nature of monitoring internet websites and online publications for customer-specified topics, and providing documentation and analysis of media content to others for business purposes; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for monitoring and analyzing legal, financial and regulatory data; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for data analysis of market and competitor trends; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for displaying, sharing, transmitting, tracking, tagging, collecting, analyzing, managing, uploading, and downloading images, photographs, electronic media, and a wide variety of data; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use by others to tag, capture, analyze, target, share and monetize demographic, lifestyle, consumer purchasing decisions, and online behavioral data; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for web analytics and measuring consumer purchasing decisions, online behavioral data, web user behavior, brand awareness and brand engagement; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for use by others to display, share, transmit, track, tag, collect, analyze, manage, upload, and download images, photographs, electronic media, and data | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 19, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |