USPTO serial 79283111
BEAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Games software; virtual reality game software; downloadable computer game programs; recorded computer game software; video games [computer games] in the form of computer programs recorded on data carriers; video games on disc [computer software]; computer software platforms; computer programs for video and computer games; computer games programmes downloaded via the internet [software] | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games; electronic games; card games; board games; role playing games; electronic board games; war games using model soldiers; games relating to fictional characters; card games; trading cards [card game]; cases for playing cards; cases for play accessories; markers [counters] for playing games; miniatures for use in games; miniatures for use in war games; action toys; toy figurines; game boards for trading card games; playing card games containing game board, playing cards, dices, printed game rules; models for use with role playing games; hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; games adapted for use with television receivers; electronic games other than those adapted for use with television receivers only; handheld computer games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Video game entertainment services; on-line gaming services; provision of on-line computer games; provision of games by means of a computer based system; providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users; provision of non-downloadable games on the Internet; providing on-line information in the field of computer gaming entertainment; games services provided via computer networks and global communication networks; organization of electronic game competitions; electronic game services provided by means of the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |