USPTO serial 79283213
3RD-EYES ANALYTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 3RD-EYES ANALYTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software applications; computer software platforms; software for commercial use; software; application software for mobile telephones; software used for running applications; application software; application software for mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Provision of software (Software as a Service, Saas); rental and updating of data processing software; rental of computer programs and software; rental and maintenance of software; rental of computer software; software as a service (SaaS); software development services; maintenance of software; design, development, maintenance and updating of software; design and development of software; design, programming and maintenance of software; design and updating of software; design, development and updating of software; development and maintenance of software; development and testing of computing methods, algorithms and software; development and updating of software; creation, maintenance and updating of software; design and development of computers and software; design, maintenance and updating of software; installation and maintenance of software; computer programming and software design; maintenance and updating of software; updating of software; services provided by consultants relating to software program design and development | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Software licensing; licensing of computer programs (legal services) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 21, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |