USPTO serial 79283267
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL KARNI SCHMIDT
JOEL KARNI SCHMIDT COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 WEST 47TH STREET21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, distilled spirits, whisky, and whisky-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 10, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |