USPTO serial 79283613
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 N. Riverside PlazaSuite 1500Chicago, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hair irons; electric hand-operated implements and appliances for styling hair; non-electric handoperated implements and appliances for styling hair; scissors; razors; electric razors and hair cutters; cases, parts, fittings and accessories all for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2021 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 26, 2021 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |