USPTO serial 79283830
JARI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JARI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric machinery for the chemical industry; slag sieve (machine); drilling machine for mines; drilling rig; mine working machines; extractive machines; bulldozer; mechanical shovels; excavators; lifting apparatus; handling apparatus for loading and unloading; wind-powered installations for generating electricity; wind turbine and its accessories; wind power generation equipment; vibratory screen separators; filter; sieve machine; mold press processing machine; plastic granulator; injection molding machine; electronic molding machine (plastic printing surface treatment); processing plastic molds; plastic wire winding machine; glass processing machine; glass industrial machinery and equipment (including daily glass machinery); glass cutting machine; petrochemical equipment; automatic handling machines [manipulators]; robot (mechanical); gear devices for machines; machines for linking devices; ore treatment machinery; machines for geological exploration; automatic electrostatic paint sprayers; drilling rig (floating or non-floating); oil exploitation; machinery and equipment for the oil refining industry; machine tool clamping device; mining and mineral processing machinery and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 7, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |