USPTO serial 79283869
YUNELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MASON, JARED MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YUNELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker Holley & Menker, PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty, face and body skin care non-medicated cosmetic products, namely, body creams, serums, non-medicated skin serums in the nature of boosters, foundations in the nature of concentrates, body butters, facial masks, body scrubs, peelings in the nature of skin peels, beauty gels, skin soaps, facial washes, gel eye masks, oils, cleansing gels, liquid soaps, hair tonics, cleansing foams in the nature of foam bath, facial cleansers, cleansing milk, body sprays, liquid eyeliners, massage gels, massage oil, massage creams, makeup remover, makeup remover milk, foundations in the nature of foundation drops, shaving balms; hair care products, namely, hair creams, non-medicated hair serums, non-medicated hair serums in the nature of boosters, hair care preparations in the nature of hair and scalp concentrates, liquids in the nature of shampoos, masks, non-medicated hair care preparations in the nature of scrubs for the hair, non-medicated hair care preparations in the nature of peels, hair gels, hair oils, hair tonics, hair sprays, non-medicated balms for the hair, conditioners, shampoos, hair waxes, hair mousses, hair fixation products, namely, hair styling fixative in the nature of hair wax; personal deodorants; perfumery; fragrances; after shave cosmetic lotions; facial foundation; eyeshadow base foundation; foundation for neck and decollete; face powder; lips powder in the nature of lip balms; lip balm; lip polisher in the nature of lip gel; lip cream; lip serum in the nature of lip boosters, eyelids powder; face and decollete powder; make-up primers, namely, face primer, eyelids primer, neck and decollete primer; eyelashes and eyebrows care products, namely, creams, serums, and lotions for eyebrows and eyelashes; toothpastes; tooth whitening gels; non-medicated mouthwashes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |