Drawing for INTRES

USPTO serial 79284137

INTRES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TRICIA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTRES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra Epp Ryan

Sandra Epp Ryan Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.45 S. 7th St., Ste. 2700Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripheral devices; computer programs, recorded, for use in analyzing textual information by AI natural language processing engine; computer programs, downloadable, for use in analyzing textual information by AI natural language processing engine; computer screen saver software, recorded and downloadable; computer software applications, downloadable, for use in analyzing textual information by AI natural language processing engine; computer software platforms, recorded and downloadable, for analyzing textual information by artificial intelligence (AI) natural language processing engine; computer software, recorded, for reading and comprehension of textual information using artificial intelligence (AI) natural language processing engine; computers; downloadable image files containing word cloud analysis results; tablet computersABANDONED—
042Cloud computing featuring software for use in artificial intelligence (AI) natural language processing, database management, data science analysis, and text mining, spreadsheet and PDF processing; computer programming; computer security consultancy; advisory services relating to computer software programming, namely, computer programming consultancy; computer software design; computer system analysis; computer system design; providing technical advice relating to operation of computers; computer virus protection services; conducting technical project studies, namely, scientific study in the nature of scientific research in the field of new technologies in artificial intelligence (AI) and conducting feasibility studies in the field of new technologies; creating and maintaining web sites for others; data encryption services; data security consultancy; digitization of documents being scanning; copying of computer programs, namely, copying of computer software; graphic arts design; hosting computer websites; installation of computer programs; internet security consultancy; maintenance of computer software; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper performance, data security and compliance; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for displaying and managing a wide variety of images and data produced by artificial intelligence (AI); providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; providing search engines for the internet; rental of computer software; rental of web servers; research and development of new products for others; server hosting; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for artificial intelligence (AI) natural language processing, database management, data science analysis, and word cloud, spreadsheet, and PDF processing; software development in the framework of software publishing; technical research, namely, technology research in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing engine; technical writing; web site design consultancyABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2021MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2021ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2021EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 26, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 9, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 8, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 27, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance