USPTO serial 79284222
Serial No. 79284222
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 79284222?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather; box-shaped hand bags, leather bags and travel bags; backpacks; leather, mesh, reusable and canvas shopping bags; bags for climbers in the nature of all-purpose carrying bags; beach bags; traveling bags; garment bags for travel; bags for sports; all-purpose carrying bags for use by campers; boxes of leather or leather board; traveling trunks; suitcases; carrying cases; leather key cases; document cases; credit card, business card and name card cases; coin purses not of precious metal; wheeled shopping bags; school bags; leather traveling bag sets; suitcases; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; hat boxes of leather; bags, envelopes, and pouches of leather for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants; footwear; headwear; bandanas being neckerchiefs; headbands being clothing; hosiery; caps being bonnets; neck scarves being mufflers; belts being clothing; dressing gowns being robes; hats; socks; bedroom slippers; suits; clothing of leather, namely, leather pants; clothing of imitation leather, namely, imitation leather pants; underclothing being underwear; scarves; furs being clothing, namely, fur coats; vests; clothing being garments, namely, shirts, pants; raincoats; skirts; petticoats; coats; fingerless gloves; trousers; parkas; dressing gowns; pullovers; dresses; aprons being clothing; uniforms; jackets; tee-shirts; shirts; shorts; Bermuda shorts; blousons; cardigans; sweaters; belts; sashes for wear; gloves being clothing; tights; drawers as clothing, including bathing suits; bathing suits; pajamas; nightgowns; dressing gowns; bathing suits and swimsuits, sportswear being not for diving in the nature of jerseys; footwear being other than orthopedic, including beach shoes; sports shoes, ski shoes; boots; half-boots; esparto shoes or sandals; sandals; slippers; caps being headwear; berets; caps being headwear including bathing caps; neckties; underwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 23, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |