USPTO serial 79284390
HAPPY FLORA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAPPY FLORA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Cultures of microorganisms for medical and veterinary use; dietary supplements; dietetic beverages adapted for medical purposes; dietetic confectionery adapted for medical purposes; dietetic drinks adapted for medical purposes; dietetic food supplements adapted for medical purposes; dietetic foods adapted for infants; dietetic foods adapted for invalids; dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes; dietetic foods for medicinal purposes; dietetic foods for use in clinical nutrition; dietetic foodstuffs for medical purposes; dietetic infusions for medical use; dietetic preparations adapted for medical use; dietetic substances adapted for medical use; dietetic substances for babies; dietetic substances for infants; dietetic substances for invalids (medical foods); dietetic substances for medical use; dietetic substances for medical use in weight control; dietetic substances for medicinal purposes; dietetic substances for veterinary use; digestants; digestive enzymes; food supplements (dietary supplements); nutriments; nutritional drinks being dietary food supplements; plant extracts (dietary supplements); protein supplements for humans; laxatives; dietary nutritional supplements; nutritional supplements for animals; nutritional supplements for humans; digestives for pharmaceutical purposes; probiotic preparations for medical use to help maintian the digestive system; probiotic supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |