USPTO serial 79284655
ZHARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2021
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ZHARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $975
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Harkins
Lisa Harkins Flener IP & Business Law77 W Washington Street, Suite 800Chicago, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Ninesquares ApS
- Other trademarks owned by The Ninesquares ApS
- Other trademarks owned by The Ninesquares ApS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named ZHARM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 12, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |