USPTO serial 79284672
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pam Kohli Jacobson
Pam Kohli Jacobson K&L Gates LLP925 4th Ave., Ste 2900Seattle, WA 98104UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for use in uploading, transmission, storage, display and sharing of video messages; downloadable video display software for use in displaying video messages; downloadable software for communication, networks and social networks for use in uploading, transmission, storage, display and sharing of video messages; downloadable computer software applications for use in uploading, transmission, storage, display and sharing of video messages | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Online entertainment services, namely, providing virtual environments in which users can interact by sharing audio and video recordings; publication of multimedia entertainment, digital audio and video; video production; video editing; editing of video recordings | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service featuring software for use in uploading, transmission, storage, display and sharing of video messages; software design, development and programming; hosting of platforms on the Internet, namely, hosting computer software platforms of others; platform as a service featuring computer software platforms for use in uploading, transmission, storage, display and sharing of video messages; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for transmission of images, audiovisual content, video content and messages; hosting of a computer software platform of others for publishing, storage, display, transmission and sharing of videos, audiovisual content, multimedia content, user-generated content and comments among users on the Internet; provision of temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in uploading, transmission, storage, display and sharing of video messages; temporary provision of non-downloadable software for the sharing of videos, content and multimedia comments between users; provision of a website for electronic storage of digital videos and photographs; interactive hosting services, namely, hosting software of others that enable the user to publish and share proprietary content and images online; hosting of websites featuring multimedia content for others; hosting of digital content on the Internet; electronic storage of videos; database design; development of databases; hosting of databases | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |