USPTO serial 79284916
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $325
Zhongnan Aluminum Wheel (Foshan) Co., Ltd.
Nanhai District,Foshan City,528000 Guang, CN
Other trademarks owned by Zhongnan Aluminum Wheel (Foshan) Co., Ltd.
Zhongnan Aluminum Wheel (Foshan) Co., Ltd.
Nanhai District,Foshan City,528000 Guang, CN
Other trademarks owned by Zhongnan Aluminum Wheel (Foshan) Co., Ltd.
Zhongnan Aluminum Wheel (Foshan) Co., Ltd.
Nanhai District,Foshan City,528000 Guang, CN
Other trademarks owned by Zhongnan Aluminum Wheel (Foshan) Co., Ltd.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu
Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu BAYRAMOGLU LAW OFFICES LLC1540 West Warm Springs RoadSuite 100Henderson, NV 89014| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Hubs for vehicle wheels; vehicle wheels; hub caps; bands for wheel hubs; motorcycle wheels; hubs for vehicle wheels, namely, motorcycle wheels | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 13, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |