USPTO serial 79284981
DI-MESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOPKINS, SARAH COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DI-MESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal Odedra
Kaushal Odedra ODEDRA LAW OFFICE, PLLC2020 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, NW #152WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Direct drawing apparatus being printing screens; cartridges for filtering machines, namely, air filters for engines; filtering machines for chemical processing; filters for cleaning cooling air for engines; filters being parts of engines; printing screens being parts of silk screen printing machines; printing machines for textile use; printing plates; sorting machines for the textile industry, for sorting fabrics and removing non-conforming material; vacuum cleaner bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bolting cloth; Synthetic fiber fabric; fabrics, namely, synthetic resin textile fabrics for the manufacture of printing screens; fabrics for textile use for the manufacture of clothing, curtains, and cover cloth for preventing dust; fabric for boots and shoes; filtering materials of textile, namely, mesh-woven fabric; mosquito nets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 13, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |