USPTO serial 79285264
EYESBERG3D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIEBL, ALEXANDRA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYESBERG3D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sorting machines for industry; robots (machines) | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Optical apparatus and instruments; measuring apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for verification (checking, inspection); machine vision systems, image processing systems consisting of cameras, computers, lighting, optics and software; vision systems for quality control and inspection, namely, cameras, computers, lighting, optics and software; machine vision sensors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical evaluations concerning design (engineers' services); scientific research; technical research; design of computers for third parties; computer development; software design; software development; research and development of new products for third parties; conducting of technical project studies; architecture; design of interior decor; software development (design); software installation; maintenance of software; updating of software; software rental; programming for computers; computer system analysis; computer system design; services provided by consultants relating to computer hardware design and development; digitization of documents; software as a service (SaaS); cloud computing; information technology (IT) consultancy; hosting of servers; vehicle roadworthiness testing; graphic arts design services; styling (industrial design); authentication of works of art; energy auditing; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |