USPTO serial 79285503
COO-WEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2021
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with COO-WEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Device for treating light bladder leakage, namely, surgical apparatus and instruments for examining and treating the bladder; medical device to minimize symptoms of light bladder leakage, namely, apparatus that exert pressure on the urethra in order to limit bladder leakage; medical device for treating light bladder leakage urinary incontinence; electronic stimulation apparatus for nerves and muscles for rehabilitative and pain management purposes; medical apparatus, namely, electric heating devices for curative treatment; body rehabilitation apparatus for medical purposes; medical apparatus for use in the control of incontinence comprising electronic stimulation units for placement on the body; medical appliances for use by the incontinent, namely, reusable medical devices being vaginal inserts having a portion which exerts a force on the adjacent urethra so as to limit bladder leakage; female urinary incontinence devices, namely, medical devices for Kegel exercises being pelvic floor exercisers; gynecological medical instruments for examining women's reproductive organs; medical apparatus for strengthening the Kegel muscles of the pelvic floor; medical apparatus for testing thickness and elasticity of muscles of the Kegel pelvic floor; medical apparatus for urological purposes, namely, urological imaging systems; medical appliances being for use by persons suffering from incontinence, namely, ostomy drainage apparatus, collection bags and pouches; medical instruments for analysing and identifying bacteria; medical instruments for cutting tissue; medical instruments for interstitial thermotherapy of biological tissue; muscle exercising apparatus for medical use, namely, electronic muscle stimulators for medical purposes; medical hygienic devices for incontinent patients, namely, surgical sterile sheets; pharmaceutical apparatus, namely, cups for dispensing medicines; injection device for pharmaceuticals; portable exercise apparatus for medical use, namely, medical devices for exercising the muscles of the bladder for incontinence management comprising medical apparatus for strengthening the Kegel muscles of the pelvic floor; remedial apparatus for paramedical use being body rehabilitation apparatus for medical purposes; support garments for medical use, namely, supportive foundation garment used to assist in weight loss, reduce post pregnancy swelling and support the midsection after surgery; therapeutic compression garments for people; therapeutic support devices, namely, supports for the wrist and ankles for therapeutic purposes, therapeutic mattress supports; urinary drainage apparatus for use in the management of incontinence, namely, catheters; urological apparatus and instruments, namely, surgical instruments, urological imaging systems; urological articles, namely, portable hand-held urinals; vaginal inserts for gynecological purposes, namely, reusable medical devices being vaginal inserts having a portion which exerts a force on the adjacent urethra so as to limit bladder leakage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |