USPTO serial 79285784
KIYOSHI JAPANESE STAINLESS STEEL 420J2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2021
- Examiner
- MMEJE, OBIEZE GINIKANWA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KIYOSHI JAPANESE STAINLESS STEEL 420J2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wanchai, Hong Kong, HK
Wanchai, Hong Kong, HK
Wanchai, Hong Kong, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gina L. Durham, Esq.
Gina L. Durham, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105-2933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cooking utensils, namely, barbecue branders; bread knives; cake cutters; can openers, non-electric; carving knives; cheese knife sets comprised of kitchen knives of different sizes; cheese slicers, non-electric; egg slicers, non-electric; flatware, namely, forks, spoons and knives; fruit knives; garlic choppers, non-electric; hand operated pasta cutters; hand tools for use in carving or decorating pumpkins, mini-pumpkins, gourds, and other fruits and vegetables, namely, knives, saws, scoops, chisels and drills; household knives; ice picks; kitchen knives; knife handles; knife sharpeners; knife sharpening instruments, namely, sharpening wheels for knives and blades; knife steels; oyster openers; pizza cutters, non-electric; pizza slicers; pruning knives; serving knives; spreader in the nature of a small knife for cheese; table knives; table cutlery, namely, forks, spoons and knives; vegetable knives; vegetable peelers, non-electric; vegetable slicers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sky Chain Trading Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Sky Chain Trading Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Sky Chain Trading Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named KIYOSHI JAPANESE STAINLESS STEEL 420J2
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 25, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |