USPTO serial 79285989
P I PHOENIX WINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with P I PHOENIX WINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky Pierce Atwood LLP254 Commercial StreetPortland, ME 04101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and map making devices, namely, flight control and autopilot systems comprising computer hardware and software for controlling the flight of drones; monitoring instruments; downloadable software for operating drones and robotic systems; downloadable software for organizing the flow of goods, in particular for transport by drones; remote controls for drones and robotic systems; the aforementioned goods with the exception of goods for the provision of drone delivery services | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Drones; military drones; civilian drones; unmanned aerial conveying vehicles; unmanned aerial vehicles, namely, unmanned airplanes; structural and integrated component parts and fittings for drones and unmanned airplanes | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of drones; installation, maintenance and repair of unmanned airplanes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services relating to robotics; construction drafting of drones and unmanned airplanes; engineering consultancy relating to drones and unmanned airplanes. except provision of drone delivery services; technological consultancy in the field of aerospace engineering; product development and design of drones and unmanned airplanes and implementation of hardware and software for drones and unmanned airplanes; product development, design, and consultancy services relating to robotics; scientific and engineering testing services relating to robotics; development, design, implementation, updating and maintenance of software and related consultancy services; development, design, implementation, updating and maintenance of operating software for drones and robotic systems and related consultancy services; development, design, implementation, updating and maintenance of software for organizing the flow of goods, in particular for transport by drones, and related consultancy services; development, design, implementation, updating and maintenance of software for control technology for drones, drone equipment and unmanned airplanes, except provision of drone delivery services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 30, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |