USPTO serial 79286288
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Sanitary masks for medical purposes; medical apparatus and instruments; physiotherapy apparatus; basins for medical purposes; breast pumps; condoms; hair prostheses; orthopaedic articles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |