USPTO serial 79286324
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN R GEISSLER
MARTIN R GEISSLER MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC4000 LEGATO ROADSUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Sponges impregnated with toiletries, namely, sponges impregnated with toiletries in the nature of cleaning preparations, sponges impregnated with toiletries in the nature of nom-medicated liquid soap, and sponges impregnated with toiletries in the nature of a skin cleanser; body cleaning and beauty care preparations, namely, body wash, non-medicated liquid soaps, beauty serums, beauty lotions, beauty gels, beauty creams and beauty creams for body care; perfumery and fragrances; cleaning preparations; fragrancing preparations, namely, fragrances, room fragrances and pet fragrances; essential oils and aromatic extracts, namely, aromatic oils and aromatic essential oils; pumice stones for use on the body; abrasives, namely, skin abrasive preparations | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | Sponges, namely, sponges used for applying make-up, toiletry sponges, bath sponges and massage sponges; cosmetic and toilet utensils, namely, makeup brushes, cosmetic brushes, cosmetic spatulas, microdermabrasion sponges for cosmetic use, and applicator wands for applying make-up | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2021 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2021 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |