Drawing for BONEPODS

USPTO serial 79286332

BONEPODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUHN, RIO NICE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BONEPODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW T RISSLER

ANDREW T RISSLER PATEL & ALMEIDA PC16830 VENTURA BLVD #360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microphones; horns for loudspeakers; vibration sensors; portable media players; pickups for telecommunication apparatus; earphones; in-ear headphones; headphones; wireless headsets for use with cellular phonesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2021MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 16, 2021ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 16, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 16, 2021OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 13, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 26, 2021OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 20, 2021OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2021OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 19, 2021OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 20, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2021OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2021LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 17, 2021LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Dec 23, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 2, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 1, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 31, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance