USPTO serial 79286410
THE FINISHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWELL, MATTHEW P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FINISHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARCUS P. DOLCE
MARCUS P. DOLCE FLYNN THIEL PC2026 RAMBLING ROADKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry; surface-active chemical agents, namely, wetting agents, surfactants for use in protecting textile and leather surfaces; leather renovating chemicals; leather-impregnating chemicals, namely, chemical agents for impregnating leathers; leather-waterproofing chemicals; preservatives for use in water treatment installations, namely, chemicals for the treatment of water; chemicals for removing bacteria, fungi, mould, moss and mould stains for use in purifying water and textile surfaces; chemicals, namely, acids, alkalis, precipitating agents, flocculants, auxiliary flocculating agents and sodium salts, in particular sodium chloride for purifying water and textile surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Varnish; dyestuffs; anti-corrosive preparations, namely, anti-corrosive coatings; protective preparations, in particular with a polymer base, for sealing chassis, metals and plastics, namely, exterior surface protective coatings | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Furbishing preparations; polishing preparations for lacquers; polishing wax; preservatives for leather, namely, leather polishes; preservation wax, namely, polishing wax | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Polishing materials for making shiny, except preparations, paper and stone, namely, polishing cloths and polishing pads being cleaning pads; cleaning sponges, in particular for grinding, polishing, washing and applying cleaning and care preparations for vehicles; wool for polishing; polishing gloves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2024 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| May 9, 2024 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Apr 3, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |