USPTO serial 79286769
KYLINFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JEANIE H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KYLINFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Hand exercisers (other than for therapeutic use); exercise bicycles (stationary -); starting blocks for sports; chest expanders [exercisers]; chest expanders [exercisers]; rackets; boxing gloves; games (balls for -); body-building apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2020 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |