USPTO serial 79286843
EXSTIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 16, 2021
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EXSTIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Kleinman
Robert Kleinman Common Sense Counsel404 West 7th StreetAustin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical, medical apparatus and instruments, namely, external nerve stimulators, neurostimulating probes, needles and catheters; medical devices, namely, external neurostimulation devices, neuromodulation devices, neurological electrical stimulation devices, pain relief devices in the nature of contrast compression therapy units for reducing pain; nerve muscle stimulators for medical purposes; transcutaneous electrical muscle stimulators for medical purposes; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators for medical purposes; electronic stimulator for nerves, muscles, skin for medical use; electronic muscle stimulators for medical purposes; electronic muscle stimulators for medical use; electronic nerve stimulators for medical use; electronic nerve stimulators for medical purposes; replacement parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2021 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |