USPTO serial 79286898
HOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells PA92 East Main StreetSuite 30Somerville, NJ 08876Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software applications for connecting users with third-party vendors or retailers of food and beverages; all the aforesaid goods not programmed in Hop programming language | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Delivery services from third-party vendors or retailers, namely, food and beverage delivery; delivery of food from third-party restaurants; providing a website for tracking information regarding transportation services of food and beverage from third-party food and beverage vendors or retailers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, maintenance and updating of software; creation and development of computer programs for data processing; provision of online non-downloadable computer programs for ordering food and beverages, provided on data networks; design and development of software for logistics; design and development of navigation systems and route planning software; provision of temporary use of non-downloadable software applications for ordering food and accessible via a Web site; provision of temporary use of on-line applications and software tools for ordering food and beverages; application service provider (ASP) services featuring software for ordering food and beverages; all the aforesaid services not using Hop programming language | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 25, 2021 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | PBPO | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |