USPTO serial 79287026
ONCHAINID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONCHAINID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trevor Taylor Graves
Trevor Taylor Graves King & Schickli, PLLC800 Corporate Drive, Suite 200Lexington, KY 40503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial transfers and transactions, and payment services, namely, electronic financial services in the nature of electronic issuance, management and transfers of securities; banking and financing services; exchanging money; currency trading; banking; investment management services; issue and redemption of tokens of value; providing information relating to the issue of tokens of value | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Data transmission services via the internet; electronic data interchange services; transferring information and data via computer networks and the internet; transferring and disseminating information and data via computer networks and the internet; provision of communications facilities for the interchange of digital data; providing access to platforms on the internet; providing access to e-commerce platforms on the internet; providing access to internet portals for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software development; computer programming and software design; computer software design; updating of computer software; maintenance of software; providing search engines for the Internet; platform as a service [paas] featuring computer software platforms for enabling users to tokenize financial instruments; software as a service [saas] services featuring software for enabling users to digitize financial instruments and identities; hosting platforms on the internet, namely, providing web hosting platforms on the internet for providing electronic financial trading services; cloud computing services, namely, cloud hosting provider services, cloud computing featuring software for the tokenization of financial instruments; data encryption services; consultancy in the field of data security; electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the internet; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; rental of software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |