USPTO serial 79287419
PQSDK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PQSDK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leigh AUGUSTINE
Leigh AUGUSTINE EIP US LLP5445 DTC Parkway, PH4Greenwood Village, CO 80111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Encryption software; cybersecurity tools; computer software; computer hardware; mobile and data security computer software; messaging applications; software development kit; authentication apparatus and equipment; key exchange software for telecommunication; system on a chip; software for processing digital certificate, software applications for Internet of things enabled devices; hardware for data security and encryption; software for data integrity, confidentiality, and authenticity; encryption apparatus; encryption software; computer software for encryption; data encryption apparatus; electronic encryption units; security tokens [encryption devices]; instant messaging software; cryptography software; utility, security and cryptography software; authentication software; computer software for biometric systems for the identification and authentication of persons | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Computer communications services namely, providing communication access services for the transmission and migration of information and data via electronic communications networks; computer intercommunication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; electronic messaging services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software creation, namely software development; software design; software development; computer software development and programming; software engineering; computer software research; computer design and programming services for others; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; computer software development; advisory and information services relating to the design and development of computer hardware; computer system design; computer design and development for others; computer aided scientific research services; computer engineering; computer hardware and software design; computer hardware development; computer programming; computer programming and maintenance of computer programs; computer programming and software design; computer security services for protection against illegal network access, namely, restricting unauthorized network access; computer security services in the nature of administering digital certificates; computer software engineering; computer software systems development; encryption of digital images, namely, data encryption services; encryption of digital music, namely, data encryption services; encryption, decryption and authentication of information, messages and data, namely, data encryption services; data encryption and decoding services; data encryption services; design and development of software for instant messaging; data security consultancy; data security consulting; computer data security services, namely, restricting unauthorized access to networks via firewalls; computer programming services for electronic data security; design and development of electronic data security systems; authentication services, namely, providing user authentication services using cryptography for controlling and confirming the source of data transmitted via telecommunications; authentication services, namely, providing user authentication services using cryptography for controlling and confirming the source of messages transmitted via telecommunications; authentication services for computer security, namely, providing user authentication services using cryptography for e-commerce transactions and secure entry and exit door access; user authentication services for verification purposes using technology for e-commerce transactions; providing user authentication services for verification purposes using biometric hardware and software technology for e-commerce transactions; providing user authentication services for verification purposes using single sign-on technology for online software applications; user authentication services for verification purposes using single sign-on technology for online software applications; computer hardware design; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting public key infrastructure software for verification purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |