USPTO serial 79287429
NEXENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEXENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Angiographic vascular introducers for the placement of catheters; biocompatible coated stents; apparatus for veterinary purposes; stents; stent delivery system; cardiovascular instruments; cardiovascular guidewires; medical stents; implantable urethral stents; intravascular implants comprised of artificial material (medical devices); balloon catheters; balloon angioplasty inflation instruments; guide wires for use with balloon dilatation catheters; balloon inflating devices for balloon dilation catheters; medical tubing for use in vascular procedures; coronary balloon dilatation catheters for angioplasty; angioplasty balloon catheters; self-expanding vascular stents; expandable braids for insertion in tubular organs of the body for the treatment of stenosis; expandable braids for insertion in blood vessels for treating stenosis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |