USPTO serial 79287585
CNHF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CNHF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Woodworking machines; plate shearing machines; log transporting machines; card clothing [parts of carding machines]; mortising machines; pulp processing machine; wrapping machines; embossing machines; timber harvesting machinery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2020 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |