USPTO serial 79287681
FIRSTHAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIRSTHAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Sanitizing wipes; hand-sanitizing preparations; antibacterial sprays; antibacterial wipes; hygienic preparations and articles; antibacterial hand lotions; disinfectants for hygiene purposes; cleaning cloths impregnated with disinfectant for hygiene purposes; sanitizers for household use; antiseptic body care preparations; medicated handwash; antiseptic washing preparations; tissues impregnated with antibacterial preparations; antimicrobial facewashes; impregnated medicated wipes; anti-bacterial preparations; wipes for medical use; bactericides; antiseptic sprays in aerosol form for use on hard surfaces; antiseptic sprays in aerosol form for use on the skin; washes (sterilizing -); disinfectants impregnated into tissues; washes (disinfectant -) [other than soap]; sanitizing wash for fruit and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |