USPTO serial 79287804
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL N. SPINK
MICHAEL N. SPINK DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC350 S. MAIN ST.SUITE 300ANN ARBOR, MI 48104| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Operation of broadband telecommunication networks, namely, telecommunications transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video; transmission of information via national and international networks; transmission of news; transmission of digital files; radio broadcasting; radio communication; electronic message sending; wireless broadcasting; rental of set-top boxes for use with televisions; satellite transmission of data, sounds and images; satellite transmission and television broadcasting services; cable television broadcasting; voice mail services; telecommunications by e-mail, namely, providing electronic transmission of email; video and television broadcasting services via the Internet, mobile communications networks and other electronic media; electronic transmission of voice, data and images by television and video broadcasting; providing telecommunication channels for teleshopping services; news agency services for electronic transmission; transmission of multimedia content via the N-screen, a multi-device platform system for watching on multiple different electronic devices; Internet portal services for the electronic transmission of multimedia content and messages via a website | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2023 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2022 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2022 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| May 29, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 27, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |