USPTO serial 79287950
VOICE ARCADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOICE ARCADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Weinberg
Steven Weinberg Holmes Weinberg PC30765 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 411Malibu, CA 90265UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Voice recognition software being recorded and downloadable for use in entertainment; computer game software being downloadable for entertainment purposes; recorded computer game software computer game software being downloadable, and recorded for use with on-line interactive games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Quiz games; arcade games; electronic interactive board games for use with an external monitor; electronic games for teaching children; video output game machines for use with television | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Multimedia entertainment software publishing services; entertainment services, namely, organizing quizzes in the field of computer games; arcade game services, namely, a collection of interactive digital games; computer and video game amusement arcade services; educational services in the nature of interactive educational games; electronic game services and organizing of electronic game competitions both provided by means of the internet; electronic game services provided by means of the internet; entertainment services in the nature of providing on-line video games; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games; providing on-line computer games; providing an on-line computer game that may be accessed by users on a global network and/or the internet; providing an on-line computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users; providing information on-line relating to computer games and computer enhancements for games for entertainment purposes; providing information to game players about the ranking of their scores of games through the web sites for entertainment purposes; providing on-line interactive multi-player computer games via the internet and electronic communication networks; providing on-line newsletters in the field of computer games; video game entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; virtual reality game services provided on-line from a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive entertainment software; design and development of computer game software; design and development of video game software; design of computer game software; design of games; development of computer game software; video game software design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |