USPTO serial 79288067
GCI GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY INDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GCI GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY INDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultancy (professional ); business appraisals; providing commercial information and advice for consumers (consumer advice shop); systemization of information into computer databases; compilation of information into computer databases; providing business information via a web site; business investigations; business management consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing access to databases; streaming of data; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing user access to a global computer network (service providers) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technology consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; information technology (IT) consultancy; computer technology consultancy; maintenance of computer software; computer software design; updating of computer software; computer software consultancy; software as a service (SaaS); recovery of computer data; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; data conversion of computer programs and data (not physical conversion); off-site data backup; electronic data storage; information technology services provided on an outsourcing basis; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |