USPTO serial 79288089
ATOMZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATOMZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio players; audio recordings; audio analyzers; audio equalizers; audio interfaces; audio mixers; audio recording equipment; audio recording apparatus; audio frequency apparatus; audio visual recordings; audio dubbing apparatus; audio mixing apparatus; audio processing apparatus; audio mixing consoles; audio mixing desks; audio editing software; mpeg audio players; audio noise reducers; audio effects apparatus; digital audio players; digital audio recorders; audio frequency amplifiers; equalizers [audio apparatus]; digital audio interface apparatus; electronic audio/video signal distribution systems; computer applications for car audio video navigation; computer hardware for signal processing of audio and video; software for processing images, graphics, audio, video and text; computer hardware for routing audio, video, and digital signals; master audio mixing desks for use in recording studios; information technology and audio-visual, multimedia and photographic devices; computer software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications; computer software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices; computer application software for streaming audio-visual media content via the Internet; computer software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures; media software; media streaming software; media development software; media and publishing software; digital media streaming devices; computer software for the display of digital media; devices for streaming media content over local wireless networks; computer software to enable the provision of electronic media via communications networks; computer software to enable the provision of electronic media via the Internet; multimedia software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |