USPTO serial 79288332
TUE HI-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUE HI-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Synthetic fibre manufacturing machines; machines for the textile industry; silk reeling machinery; electromechanical machines for chemical industry; leather-working machines; sewing machines; battery manufacturing machines; compressed air machines; belts for conveyors; soldering apparatus, electric; agricultural machines; shredders for industrial use; apparatus for use in reaming; industrial washing machines; typographic machines; agitators; brewing machines; machines for making cigarettes; equipment for the bicycle industry; engraving machines; cord making machines; enamel manufacturing machines; bulb manufacturing machines; wrapping machines; mixing machines; washing machines; disintegrators; embossing machines; glass working machines; fertilizer manufacturing machines; electroplating machines; rinsing machines; rolling mills; drilling rigs (floating or non-floating); mixers (machines); lifting and hoisting apparatus; apparatus for machining; metalworking machines; steam engines; internal combustion engines (non-land vehicles); wind power plants; pin making machines; slide fastener manufacturing machines; finishing machines; knives, electric; electrostatic industrial equipment; optics cold processing equipment; gas separating equipment; painting machines; generators of electricity; centrifugal machines; transmissions for machines; machines and apparatus for cleaning, electric; sifting installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |